The teacher I interviewed is a sixth
grade English teacher who works in a school district close to Montclair State University. She works at one of the
technology focused schools in the district. The students have to take a
technology class as part of the their core curriculum; the technology classes
are given the same weight as their science, English, math and history classes.
Despite working in a technology focused school, this teacher did not know about
the NETS-S 2007. She felt that the standards were interesting, but appeared to
be more like guidelines than requirements, in comparison to the NJCCCS.
Although
her school district has not begun to implement the NETS-S, she did acknowledge
that because of the focus in her school, each teacher is required to
incorporate technology into their lessons on a regular basis. It is more likely
that the technology teachers know about the NETS-S than the English department.
Further, she acknowledged that students are already involved in many projects
that are suggested on the NETS-S website. There is a commitment to technology
and proficiency with technology within her district.
I
was a little surprised at the response of my teacher. I had assumed that she
would be aware of the NETS-S because of her specific school within the
district. On the other hand, there are already technology requirements within
the NJCCCS and I know that this teacher works very diligently to work these
standards into her lesson plans. I was not at all surprised to the description
of the school district’s dedication to technology and the advancement of their
students in this area. It is very clear that technology is going to continue to
have an impact on education, so having the training and competency in this area
is necessary for teachers.
As
a future educator, I would want to bring up the NETS-S to my district or colleagues
as a positive addition to the NJCCCS. Where the NJCCCS gives the standards that
we, as educators, must meet to be successful in our career, NETS-S gives
suggestions for how to better complete that. It’s important to remember that
technology is a key part of learning, and I feel that any of the NJCCCS can be
met with the aid of technology. Therefore, it is necessary to give students the
ability to be independent, creative and intelligent/informed about their
technology choices. Just from taking this class, I have been exposed to
countless ways to integrate technology into the classroom to make my lessons
more interesting and applicable to student’s lives outside of the classroom.
Truly, NETS-S gives additional guidelines and suggestions to accomplish these
things. I have updated my Lesson Plan Analysis from my previous Interactivity
to add the NETS-S to the NJCCCS. Overall, I feel like the lesson improves the
more a teacher can identify why and how they’re designing their lesson plans.
Considering the school's relationship with technology, I wonder if she'll begin to implement NETS into her lessons. And given their dedication to technology, I'm surprised the teacher looked at them as recommendations, rather than requirements.I wonder if NETS were already being implemented without her knowing she was implementing them. In other words, was she already doing the "suggestions" in NETS in her efforts to teach technology in the classroom.
ReplyDelete